<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Latest posts for the topic "one-to-one relationship"]]></title>
		<link>http://www.sqlpower.ca/forum/posts/list/2.page</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Latest messages posted in the topic "one-to-one relationship"]]></description>
		<generator>JForum - http://www.jforum.net</generator>
			<item>
				<title>one-to-one relationship</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Hello,<br /> <br />  I would like to know if there's some possibility of using this kind of relationship between tables, as I couldn't see such option. The only similar relationship I saw is one to zero/one.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.sqlpower.ca/forum/posts/preList/2616/5883.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.sqlpower.ca/forum/posts/preList/2616/5883.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 3 Mar 2010 08:03:10]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ bluegod1]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>one-to-one relationship</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ I guess the architect assumes that if it's one-to-one relationship, then the child table will an attribute of the parent table instead. <br /> <br /> probably that's why there is no one to one relationship option in the diagram.<br /> <br /> I just use the one to one/zero option, and then modify it to one to one in DB2. Hope that helps.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.sqlpower.ca/forum/posts/preList/2616/5894.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.sqlpower.ca/forum/posts/preList/2616/5894.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 5 Mar 2010 18:48:47]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ aliceZhu]]></author>
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
